Posts Tagged ‘WRAP’

Waste sector awaits election outcome

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

As the country goes to the polls today (May 6), councils and businesses are watching closely to see what the national and local elections will mean for the waste and recycling sector.

 

Latest polls suggest there could be a hung parliament

Latest polls suggest there could be a hung parliament

In what has been widely heralded as the most wide-open election of recent years, all 650 constituencies across the UK are set to vote for one Member of Parliament (MP) each, while council elections are also to be held in many parts of England. Top of the agenda for any new government will be tackling the country’s national debt, with sweeping public spending cuts expected regardless of who comes to power. This in turn is likely to impact upon local authority waste management budgets and central government support for the sector.

While waste and recycling has not been a focal point of the election campaign, the three main parties have addressed the issue in their manifestoes with Labour, the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives all aspiring to a “zero waste nation” and each pledging to set up a bank to fund green infrastructure.

However, there are also differences in their approach to waste – with the Conservatives advocating incentives and voluntary agreements to increase recycling while the Liberal Democrats have thrown their support behind more binding measures such as variable charging and Labour has remained adamant that councils should be left to choose.

Below is a summary of what each party has committed to with regards to waste if they come to power.

Conservative

• Introduce a Responsibility Deal on waste – a voluntary arrangement among producers to cut back on the production of waste and improve its disposal in a bid to move towards a goal of a zero-waste society
• Encourage councils to reward people for recycling.
• Provide funding for councils to provide weekly waste collections.
• Put a floor under the standard rate of landfill tax until 2020, in order to encourage alternative forms of waste disposal.
• Abolish any quangos that do not perform a technical function or a function that requires political impartiality, or act independently to establish facts.
• Abolish the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC), instead returning the final decision on large-scale projects including energy-from-waste facilities to a Minister.
• Create a Green Investment Bank to draw together money currently divided across existing government initiatives to finance private sector investment and new green technology start-ups.
• Give local authorities the power to establish district heating networks which use biogas and other low carbon fuels.

Labour

• Drive the introduction of ‘recycling on the go’, with separated public bins on the street and in shopping centres.
• Move towards a ‘zero waste’ Britain by stimulating the sustainable use of resources and banning recyclable and biodegradable materials from landfill.
• Create a ‘Green Investment Bank’ to invest £2 billion in low carbon infrastructure.
• Ensure 40% of Britain’s electricity will come from low-carbon sources, including renewables, by 2020.
• Develop the IPC to speed up decision-making on major projects.
• Create 400,000 new green jobs by 2015.
• Seek to drive down the costs of regulation by more than £6 billion by 2015.

Liberal Democrats

• Give councils the power to introduce variable waste charging – allowing those residents who recycle less to be charged.
• Set targets for ‘zero waste’ including less packaging, more recycling and a huge increase in anaerobic digestion to generate energy from food and farm waste.
• Improve resource efficiency and reduce waste through better produce standards and reducing excess packaging.
• Introduce sustainable design standards to make products last longer and have longer guarantees;
• Cut packaging by forcing retailers and manufacturers to accept products and packaging back from customers once they have come to the end of their useful life – starting with carrier bags and mobile phones.
• Use the government’s purchasing power to expand the market for green, sustainable products and technology.
• Set a target for 40% of UK electricity to come from “clean” sources by 2020, rising to 100% by 2050, and also establishing a “renewables routemap” to 2050.
• Implement a higher feed-in tariff than under current government plans
• Set up a UK Infrastructure Bank to provide capital guarantees and equity to infrastructure projects such as new rail services and green energy.
• Abolish the IPC and return decision-making to the local level, including third party right of appeal where planning decisions go against locally agreed plans.
• A scrappage scheme for buses costing £140 million.

Plaid Cymru and SNP

For a summary of Plaid Cymru’s waste policy, please click here. For the Scottish National Party’s green manifesto policies, which do not cover waste, click here.

Norris visits £160m Lakeside incinerator

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

Waste and recycling minister Dan Norris today (March 23) visited the recently-commissioned £160 million Lakeside Energy-from-Waste facility, at Colnbook near Slough, and praised the contribution the plant was making to diverting waste from landfill.

His tour of the site, which has been developed as a joint-venture by waste management companies Grundon and Viridor, came just a day after the environment secretary, Hilary Benn, visited BiogenGreenfinch’s anaerobic digestion facility at Westwood in Northamptonshire to see how food waste can be turned into energy.

 

Waste and recycling minister Dan Norris (right) is shown how waste is turned into energy at the Lakeside Energy-from-Waste facility in Berkshire today

Waste and recycling minister Dan Norris (right) is shown how waste is turned into energy at the Lakeside Energy-from-Waste facility in Berkshire today

Mr Norris was shown how the Lakeside facility is being used to turn up to 410,000 tonnes of residual household and business waste a year into 37 megawatts (MW) of electricity, the majority of which is exported to the National Grid.

 And, he highlighted the importance role that the facility, which was officially handed over to Grundon and Viridor in January 2010 (see letsrecycle.com story), had to play in dealing with waste.

“Reducing, reusing of recycling is our first priority but it’s not possible for some types of material – which is where facilities like this come in,” he said.

“By providing power for tens of thousands of homes through energy from waste incineration, this is yet another example of seeing waste as a resource rather than something that should just be thrown away,” he added.

His sentiments were echoed by Grundon’s Richard Skehens, a director of the Lakeside EFW Ltd company set up to operate the facility, who also welcomed the minister’s decision to visit the plant.

“We are pleased that the Minister had seen the essential and important role that Lakeside and other energy from waste facilities can play working alongside high levels of recycling to improve resource efficiency in the UK,” he said.

“These facilities successfully deploy safe, robust and efficient technology and provide good value for money for our customers, which is important in the current economic climate,” he added.

Benn

Meanwhile, environment secretary Hilary Benn yesterday (March 22) visited BiogenGreenfinch’s anaerobic digestion (AD) facility at Westwood in Northamptonshire.

His visit to the plant, which has the capacity to process up to 45,000 tonnes of food waste a year, was aimed at learning more about how food waste from households, businesses and schools can be diverted from landfill and turned into both energy and a digestate for use as fertiliser.

It came just days after Mr Benn launched a consultation on potential landfill bans for materials including food waste by emphasising the potential for recovering energy from the waste stream using AD technology (see letsrecycle.com story).

Source : www.letsrecycle.com

WRAP claims benefits of EfW in updated life cycle research

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

Recycling is still the most environmentally beneficial waste management option for materials such as paper, card and plastics, according to a report published today (March 16) by the Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP).

 

However, the study does claim that sending paper to energy recovery could be comparable in terms of climate change potential – as a measure of greenhouse gas emissions – and recommends that for biopolymers such as corn starch bags this could be the best option. 

One of the main findings of the WRAP report was that incinerating paper had comparable climate change potential to recycling the material

One of the main findings of the WRAP report was that incinerating paper had comparable climate change potential to recycling the material

The research, entitled ‘Environmental benefits of recycling – 2010 update’, builds on a 2006 study commissioned by WRAP (see letsrecycle.com story) which looked at the impact of landfilling, recycling or incinerating materials.

In the 256-page document, WRAP scrutinised over 200 life cycle analyses of waste material disposal to consider which route would give the most preferred benefits on four fronts: climate change abatement; energy demand; water consumption; and, depletion of natural resources.

The research looked at food waste, garden waste, textiles and biopolymers and advancements in waste treatment technologies, such as pyrolysis, gasification and anaerobic digestion.

Aluminium, steel, glass and aggregates, which had been part of the 2006 study, were excluded because there has been little change in treatment technology for these materials, so it was considered that there would be little change in the results.

And, while recycling emerged as the preferred disposal option for paper, cardboard, plastics and biopolymers, the 2010 report gives credence to the idea that – in some cases – it may be beneficial for material to be used in energy recovery applications.

The attention given to thermal treatment methods in the report comes in the wake of WRAP announcing in October 2009 that it would be changing its agenda to include a focus on developing markets for energy-from-waste (see letsrecycle.com story).

The executive summary for the report states: “This report reinforces the key conclusion of the first report that recycling of paper/cardboard, plastics and biopolymers for most indicators assessed gives more environmental benefits than other waste management options.”

Paper

In its assessment of the preferred disposal option for paper, WRAP explained that the relationship between incineration and recycling “appears more complex” than in the 2006 study, which could be attributed to the development of new thermal treatment technologies.

And, while it claimed that recycling is preferable in terms of meeting energy demand and water consumption, they were found to be broadly comparable in terms of climate change potential.

Keith James, environmental policy manager at WRAP, claimed that the finding was similar to that made in the 2006 report, and said it was important to stress that the quality of paper being recycled diminishes each time it is recycled. And, once it is of too low quality to be recycled further, it is important to find appropriate outlets.

The research highlights three case studies, including French and Swedish examples, where incineration appeared on a comparable level with recycling.

The report states: “The comparison between recycling and incineration appears more complex, as better energy recovery efficiencies have been built into the more recent LCAs. In general, the data shows that recycling is preferable for energy demand and water consumption, but they are comparable for climate change.”

Biopolymers

 The report said that the preferred disposal option for biopolymer plastics – such as corn starch bags – is currently incineration, due to the lack of abundant material or suitable recycling infrastructure. Until a biopolymer market is created, WRAP claims energy recovery is the best use.

 Speaking to letsrecycle.com, Mr James said: “With bio-polymers there is not that much on the market at the moment so there isn’t enough to warrant separate collection.”

On the subject of plastics as a whole, the WRAP report claims that incineration with energy recovery “performs poorly” and the preferred treatment method is stated as mechanical recycling – a finding which conforms with the results of the 2006 study.

The new report claimed that mechanical recycling of plastics is the best waste management option and that the benefits were mainly achieved due to avoiding production of virgin plastics.

Food and garden waste

On the topic of food and garden waste, anaerobic digestion emerged as the preferred treatment option, with composting and energy recovery deemed comparable in their contribution to climate change potential.

In addition, the report claimed that home compost bins should be properly managed and aerated, to avoid anaerobic conditions forming, which could result in the emission of methane.

Wood and Textiles

The lack of published life cycle analyses was raised as a point of contention in the report when it attempted to consider the best possible option for wood and textile materials.

Despite the lack of available data for the two material streams, WRAP claimed that incineration with energy recovery would be the preferable option for wood in terms of energy demand, while recycling was preferred for climate change potential.

Meanwhile, it was assessed – from the data available – that recycling had “substantial environmental benefits” for textiles, with the scale of the benefits dependent on recovery routes and the avoidance of material production.

Related links

This lack of available data also hampered WRAP’s intention of assessing the impact of new waste treatment technologies – which, WRAP claimed, had a “disappointing” number of life cycle analyses available. However, the study claimed the data that was available was “very encouraging”.

Commenting on the overall aim of the study, Mr James said: “We were interested in understanding how technology is developing because, obviously, things don’t stand still and we need to understand how much has changed in those intervening four years and what the options now are for a range of materials We wanted to see what evidence is out there.”

The report is set to be formally published on WRAP’s website later today (March 16).

Source : http://www.letsrecycle.com/